Advertisement
Advertisement
Japan
Get more with myNEWS
A personalised news feed of stories that matter to you
Learn more
Japanese PM Fumio Kishida and South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol meet in Lithuania last year. Photo: Kyodo

Critics blast Seoul’s ‘submissive’ Tokyo ties as Kishida seeks Yoon talks before exit

  • South Korea’s opposition has accused President Yoon Suk-yeol of being pro-Tokyo – as Japan’s PM plans one last visit before stepping down
Japan
Fumio Kishida is reportedly making progress on plans to hold talks with South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol in Seoul before the Japanese prime minister hands over power to his successor. Analysts say the planned meeting is also aimed at bolstering the two countries’ three-way alliance with the US.
However, South Korea’s main opposition party appears determined to undermine the chances of a positive outcome from such a summit. On Monday, the Democratic Party (DPK) accused Yoon of taking a “submissive” diplomatic stance towards Japan, criticising him for allegedly appointing pro-Japanese officials and ordering the removal of models of the Dokdo islands from Seoul’s subway stations.
The two islets, also known as the Liancourt Rocks, are controlled by South Korea but claimed by Japan, which refers to them as Takeshima.

“We have seen continued pro-Japan submissive diplomacy and a desperation to erase history” under Yoon, the DPK’s parliamentary leader, Park Chan-dae, was quoted as saying by Yonhap News.

“On the one hand, the pro-Japan faction is gaining power, while on the other, Dokdo is disappearing, which can hardly be dismissed as a coincidence.”

Nevertheless, Seoul’s presidential office has confirmed that discussions are under way regarding the timing of Kishida’s potential visit. Japan’s Kyodo News has also reported on the prospect of such a summit occurring before a planned September 27 election for a new leader of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, who will then assume the post of prime minister.
The two islet off the coast of South Korea known as Dokdo, or Takeshima in Japan. Photo: AP
Stephen Nagy, an international-relations professor at Tokyo’s International Christian University, said the two leaders aim to “institutionalise as much as possible the outcomes of the Camp David Accords of August 2023” and ensure the trilateral agreement between Japan, South Korea and the United States can endure beyond the tenures of Kishida and Yoon.
Since Yoon’s election in March 2022, the two countries have made significant progress in improving their historically fraught bilateral relationship, sidestepping decades of hostility that stemmed largely from Japan’s brutal occupation of the Korean peninsula between 1910 and 1945.
Issues such as “comfort women” – Korean women forced to work in Japanese military brothels – and forced labour continue to generate resentment in South Korea. But Nagy noted that relations between the two nations have been more forward-looking in recent years.

“The relationship is much more positive, although it is clear that some in South Korea, such as the opposition, feel that Yoon has tacked too much to the Japanese and US positions,” he told This Week in Asia. However, Nagy believes Yoon remains “pretty firm in his mindset”.

“He does not care about what the public thinks because his actions are motivated by what he thinks is in the best interests of South Korea,” he said. “The opposition will use this and there will be pushback, but Yoon knows he only has a single term in office, and he is using that to cement and institutionalise this relationship for the good of the country.”

US President Joe Biden looks on as Yoon shakes hands with Kishida during a joint news conference last year. Photo: AP

Not all analysts are as optimistic about the prospects for a final Kishida-Yoon meeting. Ryo Hinata-Yamaguchi, an assistant professor of international relations at the University of Tokyo, expressed less confidence in the leaders’ ability to “pull it off” due to criticism of the plan in South Korea and the apparent reluctance of the Japanese government to officially comment on the proposed summit.

Hinata-Yamaguchi suggested it would be beneficial for Tokyo to reaffirm that the bilateral and trilateral agreements were progressing and that steps towards these goals would continue even after Kishida’s departure, in order to lay the foundations for his successor.

“It’s likely that South Korea is a little concerned about who the next Japanese prime minister is going to be, so this will provide more reassurance that Kishida wants continuity,” he said.

Ultimately, Hinata-Yamaguchi viewed the potential meeting as largely a messaging exercise, intended to convey that relations between the two countries are improving.

Nagy said Kishida, who has little left to lose politically given the limited time remaining in his leadership, may be hoping the meeting will help cement his legacy. But resistance from the South Korean opposition party was to be expected, he said.

In his assessment, South Korea’s opposition could potentially disrupt collaborative efforts between Seoul and its Japanese and American allies in areas such as defence, trade and semiconductors.

“Yoon is doing what he firmly believes is in the best interest of the country, but if the opposition can derail Kishida’s visit and delegitimise the Yoon government, then that creates a cascade of problems,” he warned.

2